Is NSC 237659 Safe in Breastfeeding

I am a breastfeeding mother and i want to know if it is safe to use NSC 237659? Is NSC 237659 safe for nursing mother and child? Does NSC 237659 extracts into breast milk? Does NSC 237659 has any long term or short term side effects on infants? Can NSC 237659 influence milk supply or can NSC 237659 decrease milk supply in lactating mothers?

• DrLact safety Score for NSC 237659 is 5 out of 8 which is considered Unsafe as per our analyses.
• A safety Score of 5 indicates that usage of NSC 237659 may cause serious side effects in breastfed baby.
• Our study of different scientific research indicates that NSC 237659 may cause moderate to high side effects or may affect milk supply in lactating mother.
• Our suggestion is to use safer alternate options rather than using NSC 237659 .
• It is recommended to evaluate the advantage of not breastfeeding while using NSC 237659 Vs not using NSC 237659 And continue breastfeeding.
• While using NSC 237659 Its must to monitor child for possible reactions. It is also important to understand that side effects vary largely based on age of breastfed child and time of medication in addition to dosage.
• Score calculated using the DrLact safety Version 1.2 model, this score ranges from 0 to 8 and measures overall safety of drug in lactation. Scores are primarily calculated using publicly available case studies, research papers, other scientific journals and publically available data.

Check-up for sedation or hypotonia.In Spain, it has been commercialized in association with diuretic drugs.

Because no information is available on the use of NSC 237659 during breastfeeding and it might adversely affect the breastfed infant, an alternate drug may be preferred, especially while nursing a newborn or preterm infant.

Although not well documented, NSC 237659 is said to cause nasal stuffiness and increased tracheobronchial secretions in breastfed infants.[1]

NSC 237659 has reportedly caused galactorrhea and has been used to increase breastmilk production, although it is obsolete for this use.[2][3][4]